en.wikipedia.org website review
Improve your SEO :: free trial!
en.wikipedia.org is 64% geoptimaliseerd!
SEO Keyword summary for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_ncaa_division_iii_football_season
Keywords are extracted from the main content of your website and are the primary indicator of the words this page could rank for. By frequenty count we expect your focus keyword to be conference
Focus keyword
Short and long tail
Short Tail Keywords conference football division |
long Tail Keywords (2 words) w l division iii ncaa division team w conf overall |
long Tail Keywords (3 words) ncaa division iii conf overall team team w l vte conf overall overall team w w l w standings vte conf |
en.wikipedia.org On-Page SEO Scan
Descriptive Elements
The <head> element of a en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_ncaa_division_iii_football_season page is used to inform the browser and visitors of the page about the general meta information. The head section of the page is where we place the page title, the definition of the HTML version used, the language of in which the page is written. In the head section we can also include JavaScript and CSS (markup) files for the page.
Page title
Title length
ncaa division iii football season wikipedia
Meta description
Meta description legth
Meta description SEO
No meta relevance in the description detected !
Content SEO
Number of Words
Spam detected?
Headings
Heading distribution
Heading normalisation
Heading SEO impact
Emphasis (bold and italic)
Emphasis SEO impact
Images
Number of images
Images dimensions
Image alt descriptions
Images SEO impact
wikipedia free encyclopedia wikimedia foundation powered mediawiki
Mobile SEO en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_ncaa_division_iii_football_season
Mobile rendering
Mobile optimizations
Responsive design detected (mobile css)
No flash detected !
Mobile improvement
Marketing / lead generation for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2002_ncaa_division_iii_football_season
Social Media
Facebook shares | Facebook likes | ||
Facebook comments | Tweets | ||
Google +1 |
Conversion form
Search form
Analytics
Online presence
SERP Preview
SERP Title
SERP Link
SERP Description
Domain Level SEO
Domain name
16 characters long
Domain name SEO Impact
Path name
division found in path !
football found in path !
iii found in path !
ncaa found in path !
season found in path !
Structured data
Publisher Markup
Other Structured data
Website configuration
Correct processing of non-existing pages?
Favicon icon found?
Robots.txt found?
Sitemap found?
Navigation and internal links
Navigation
Url seperator
Human readable urls
Number of links
Link SEO Impact
statistics
|
en.m.wikipedia.org |
en.wikipedia.org wikimedia foundation inc
|
w httpsenwikipediaorgwindexphptitle2002ncaadivisioniiifootballseasonoldid1224058002
page information
printable version
|
wiki ncaa division iii football championship
salem football stadium
salem virginia
mount union
gagliardi trophy
ncaa division iii
college football
ncaa division iii
trinity tx
western maryland college
mcdaniel college
western maryland green terror
mcdaniel
2002 centennial conference football standings
2002 american southwest conference football standings
mary hardinbaylor
howard payne
hardinsimmons
east texas baptist
mississippi college
austin
louisiana college
texas lutheran
mcmurry
sul ross
2002 atlantic central football conference standings
frostburg state
salisbury
wesley
apprentice
muhlenberg
johns hopkins
dickinson
franklin marshall
gettysburg
ursinus
2002 college conference of illinois and wisconsin football standings
wheaton il
augustana il
millikin
north central il
illinois wesleyan
carthage
elmhurst
north park
2002 dixie conference football standings
christopher newport
ferrum
shenandoah
greensboro
methodist
averett
chowan
2002 empire 8 athletic conference football standings
ithaca
hartwick
st john fisher
alfred
utica
2002 freedom football conference standings
springfield
merchant marine
western connecticut
norwich
coast guard
plymouth state
2002 heartland collegiate athletic conference football standings
hanover
anderson in
mount st joseph
manchester
franklin in
bluffton
defiance
2002 illinibadger football conference standings
macmurray
concordia wi
aurora
lakeland
benedictine il
eureka
greenville
concordia il
2002 iowa conference football standings
wartburg
central ia
simpson ia
loras
cornell ia
luther
buena vista
upper iowa
dubuque
2002 michigan intercollegiate athletic association football standings
alma
adrian
olivet
albion
kalamazoo
wisconsin lutheran
2002 middle atlantic conference football standings
kings college
widener
moravian
lycoming
wilkes
susquehanna
juniata
albright
fairleigh dickinsonflorham
delaware valley
lebanon valley
2002 midwest conference football standings
st norbert
lake forest
beloit
monmouth il
grinnell
illinois college
carroll wi
lawrence
2002 minnesota intercollegiate athletic conference football standings
saint johns mn
concordiamoorhead
gustavus adolphus
bethel mn
st thomas mn
st olaf
hamline
augsburg
carleton
2002 new england football conference standings
westfield state
worcester state
fitchburg state
bridgewater state
framingham state
maine maritime
massachusetts maritime
umass dartmouth
curry
nichols
salve regina
western new england
2002 new england small college athletic conference football standings
trinity ct
williams
amherst
wesleyan
colby
middlebury
bates
tufts
bowdoin
hamilton
2002 new jersey athletic conference football standings
rowan
cortland
tcnj
montclair state
new jersey city
william paterson
2002 north coast athletic conference football standings
wittenberg
wooster
allegheny
earlham
ohio wesleyan
oberlin
denison
kenyon
hiram
2002 northwest conference football standings
linfield
whitworth
willamette
pacific lutheran
lewis clark
puget sound
2002 ohio athletic conference football standings
mount union
john carroll
baldwinwallace
capital
ohio northern
muskingum
marietta
wilmington oh
heidelberg
otterbein
2002 old dominion athletic conference football standings
bridgewater
hampdensydney
randolphmacon
washington and lee
catholic university
emory henry
guilford
2002 presidents athletic conference football standings
washington jefferson
westminster pa
waynesburg
thiel
bethany wv
grove city
2002 southern california intercollegiate athletic conference football standings
redlands
claremontmuddscripps
cal lutheran
occidental
la verne
whittier
2002 southern collegiate athletic conference football standings
depauw
sewanee
centre
rhodes
millsaps
2002 university athletic association football standings
washingtonsaint louis
case western reserve
carnegie mellon
chicago
2002 upper midwest athletic conference football standings
northwestern mn
martin luther
crown
trinity bible
maranatha baptist
westminster mo
principia
rockford
blackburn
2002 upstate collegiate athletic association football standings
hobart
union ny
rochester ny
st lawrence
2002 wisconsin intercollegiate athletic conference football standings
wisconsinla crosse
wisconsineau claire
wisconsinstout
wisconsinstevens point
wisconsinwhitewater
wisconsinoshkosh
wisconsinriver falls
wisconsinplatteville
2002 ncaa division iii independents football records
brockport
thomas more
macalester
menlo
pomonapitzer
chapman
mount ida
colorado college
buffalo state
maryville tn
empire 8 conference
widener
northwesternst paul
ncaa division i
ncaa university division
ncaa division iafbs
ncaa division iaafcs
ncaa college division
ncaa division ii
|
Links to external pages
Outloing links
www.wikidata.org
fs.ncaa.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
www.wikimediafoundation.org
SEO Advice for en.wikipedia.org
In this section we provide pointers on how you can to optimize your web page so it can be found more easily by search engines and how to make it rank higher by optimizing the content of the page itself. For each of the individual criteria the maximum score is 100%. A score below 70% is considered to be indication that the page is not complying with general SEO standards and should be evaluated and/or fixed. Not every factor is weighted the same and some are not as important as others. Relatively unimportant factors like meta keywords are not included in the overall score.
Item | Factor | Pointers | |
---|---|---|---|
PageTitle | 100% | Far too many sites lack a page title. A page title is the first thing that shows in the search results so always use the title element. | |
Title relevance | 100% | A title should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 100 % match | |
Title Length | 100% | Limit your title to anywhere between 40 and 70 characters. Your title was 51 characters long | |
Meta Description | 0% | A meta description is the second element that shows in the search results so always use the meta description. | |
Meta description length | 0% | The meta description should be between 145 and 160 characters. This meta description is 1 characters long. | |
Meta description relevance | 0% | Meta Description should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 0 % match | |
Number of internal links | 30% | Linking to internal pages makes pages easier to find for search engines. Try to keep the number of links on your page roughly below 100. There are 679 internal links on this page. | |
Folder structure | 100% | We found a folder structure in the links on your page. A good folder structure makes a site easier to navigate. We found 3 level 1 folders and 8 folders above or in the first level of navigation. | |
Headings | 100% | Headers should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 53 % match | |
Links | 16% | Link anchors should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 8 % match | |
Image alt tags | 39% | Image alt tags should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 14 % match | |
Bold and italic | 100% | Bold and italic tags should reflect the contents of a site to some degree. This site has a 40 % match | |
Html ratio | 30% | Try to keep the html / text ratio as low as possible. More html means longer loading times. Layout should be handled in a serpate css file | |
Image descriptions | 67% | 66.666666666667 % of all images have been described via the "alt" attribute. Describing images with relevant text may lead to better results in the search engines. | |
Page errors | 100% | Pages with no errors display significantly faster on most browsers. We detected 0 errors and warnings | |
WordCount | 20% | An ideal page contains between 400 and 600 words.This page contains 1819 words | |
Server response time | 30% | A slow server slows down a website. This server responds 239.19% slower the average | |
Gzip compression | 30% | This site does not use Gzip compression. Pages may not display as fast as they could | |
Keywords in Domainname | 100% | There are important keywords in your domain name | |
Keywords in domain path | 100% | There are important keywords in the domain path | |
Structured Data | 100% | Structured data makes it easier for search engines to index your website | |
Inline css | 0% | Do not use inline css declarations. Inline css will slow down the rendering of the website. We detected 314 inline style declarations ( <a style="color:green">) with a size of 38539 bytes | |
Excessive use of the same words | 100% | There is no indication that there are one or more keywords that are used excessively. | |
Frames or iframes | 100% | Perfect, detected not (i)frames on your webpagina | |
Flash | 100% | Perfect, we detected no flash objects on your page | |
Css | 30% | We detected too much (2) CSS files on your page. Css files block the loading of a webpage. | |
Javascript | 100% | Perfect, we did not detect too many blocking JavaScript files | |
Mobile Website | 100% | Perfect, we found a responsive design for mobile users | |
Most important heading | 100% | Perfect, we detected a correct use of the most important (h1) heading! | |
Normalized headings | 40% | We dit not font a normalized heading structure. A heading 2 (h2) for example should be followed by a heading of an equal level (h2), a child heading (h3) or even a aprent heading (h1). |
How would you like to have SEO advice for all your pages ?? Start your SEO Dashboard and optimize your website!
en.wikipedia.org images and descriptions
6 images found at en.wikipedia.org Images can improve the user experience for a website by making a pag visually appealing Images can also add extra keyword relevance to a webpage by using alt tags. Images can also slow down a website. If the width and height for a picture is not specified for a browser know in advance how large the image is. A browser must first load the picture and see before it knows how much space should be on the page. Upon reservation In the meantime, the browser can do little but wait. When the height and width for the plate are given in the HTML code, a browser just continues to build for a page while the images load in the background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/icons/wikipedia.png height: 50 width: 50 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-wordmark-en.svg height: height attribute not set width: width attribute not set description: wikipedia |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-tagline-en.svg height: 13 width: 117 description: the free encyclopedia |
|
https://login.wikimedia.org/wiki/special:centralautologin/start?type=1x1 height: 1 width: 1 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/footer/wikimedia-button.svg height: 29 width: 84 description: wikimedia foundation |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/resources/assets/poweredby_mediawiki.svg height: 31 width: 88 description: powered by mediawiki |
How are images contributing to your SEO site-wise ? Your leading content tool has the awnsers!