en.wikipedia.org website review
Improve your SEO :: free trial!
en.wikipedia.org is 59% geoptimaliseerd!
SEO Keyword summary for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/jungle_primary
Keywords are extracted from the main content of your website and are the primary indicator of the words this page could rank for. By frequenty count we expect your focus keyword to be primary
Focus keyword
Short and long tail
Short Tail Keywords primary party state |
long Tail Keywords (2 words) washington state top two two primary blanket primary general election |
long Tail Keywords (3 words) top two primary candidate party preference secretary of state nonpartisan blanket primary party preference support preference support outcome journal of politics |
en.wikipedia.org On-Page SEO Scan
Descriptive Elements
The <head> element of a en.wikipedia.org/wiki/jungle_primary page is used to inform the browser and visitors of the page about the general meta information. The head section of the page is where we place the page title, the definition of the HTML version used, the language of in which the page is written. In the head section we can also include JavaScript and CSS (markup) files for the page.
Page title
Title length
nonpartisan blanket primary wikipedia
Meta description
Meta description legth
Meta description SEO
No meta relevance in the description detected !
Content SEO
Number of Words
Spam detected?
Headings
Heading distribution
Heading normalisation
Heading SEO impact
Emphasis (bold and italic)
Emphasis SEO impact
Images
Number of images
Images dimensions
Image alt descriptions
Images SEO impact
wikipedia free encyclopedia icon wikimedia foundation powered mediawiki
Mobile SEO en.wikipedia.org/wiki/jungle_primary
Mobile rendering
Mobile optimizations
Responsive design detected (mobile css)
No flash detected !
Mobile improvement
Marketing / lead generation for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/jungle_primary
Social Media
Facebook shares | Facebook likes | ||
Facebook comments | Tweets | ||
Google +1 |
Conversion form
Search form
Analytics
Online presence
SERP Preview
SERP Title
SERP Link
SERP Description
Domain Level SEO
Domain name
16 characters long
Domain name SEO Impact
Path name
primary found in path !
Structured data
Publisher Markup
Other Structured data
Website configuration
Correct processing of non-existing pages?
Favicon icon found?
Robots.txt found?
Sitemap found?
Navigation and internal links
Navigation
Url seperator
Human readable urls
Number of links
Link SEO Impact
statistics
|
en.m.wikipedia.org |
en.wikipedia.org wikimedia foundation inc
|
w httpsenwikipediaorgwindexphptitlenonpartisanblanketprimaryoldid1247326751
page information
printable version
jungle primary
seat linkage system
dominance paradox
harsanyis utilitarian theorem
northern mariana islands
|
wiki louisiana primary
social choice
electoral systems
mechanism design
comparative politics
comparison
by country
singlewinner methods
plurality
firstpastthepost
tworound system
partisan primary
instantrunoff voting
alternative vote
condorcet methods
condorcetirv
roundrobin voting
minimax
schulze
ranked pairs
maximal lottery
positional voting
plurality
borda count
baldwin
antiplurality
coombs
cardinal voting
score voting
approval voting
majority judgment
star voting
proportional representation
partylist
apportionment
highest averages
largest remainders
national remnant
biproportional
list type
closed list
open list
panachage
listfree pr
localized list
quotaremainder methods
single transferable vote
schulze stv
cpostv
quota borda
approvalbased committees
thieles method
phragmens method
expanding approvals rule
method of equal shares
fractional social choice
direct representation
interactive representation
liquid democracy
fractional approval voting
random ballot
semiproportional representation
cumulative
limited voting
mixed systems
mixedmember majoritarian
compensatory
parallel superposition
coexistence
fusion majority bonus
vote linkage system
negative vote transfer
mixed ballot
supermixed systems
dualmember proportional
ruralurban proportional
majority jackpot
single vote
double simultaneous vote
pathology
spoiler effect
cloning paradox
frustrated majorities paradox
center squeeze
perverse response
bestisworst paradox
noshow paradox
multiple districts paradox
exaggeration
lesser evil voting
truncation
turkeyraising
majority rule
tyranny of the majority
discursive dilemma
majority impossibility
social choice theorists
impossibility theorems
arrows theorem
moulins impossibility theorem
mckelveyschofield chaos theorem
gibbards theorem
median voter theorem
condorcets jury theorem
mays theorem
condorcet dominance theorems
primary election
moderate
political scientists
condorcet
median voter property
unified primary
approval voting
votesplitting
washington
california
alaska
2022 house special election
blanket primary
supreme court of the united states
california democratic party v jones
general election
facially
john roberts
as applied challenges
washington libertarian party
washington state democratic party
washington state republican party
texas
special elections
phil gramm
switching from the democratic to the republican party
oregon
oregon senate
michael bloomberg
enron
john d arnold
fairvote
common cause
elections in alaska
2020 alaska elections
measure 2
topfour primary
elections in california
proposition 62
initiative
proposition 14
californias 15th congressional district
congressional districts
congressional districts
east bay
hayward
livermore
pete stark
eric swalwell
democratic
incumbent
no party preference
elections in washington state
sam reed
initiative 872
2008 stated preference
washington state 2010 elections district 14
nick harper
jean berkey
moxie media scandal
rob mckenna
clint didier
dino rossi
patty murray
national football league
washington redskins
ron paul
sarah palin
tea party
central washington
tricities
yakima
doc hastings
dan newhouse
christine gregoire
jay inslee
republican
independent
washingtons 2016 primary for state treasurer
expert witness
twopartypreferred vote
wayback machine
time
issn
ssrn
s2cid
california secretary of state
seattle postintelligencer
nate silver
fivethirtyeightcom
the new york times
the seattle times
los angeles times
toptwo primary
electoral reform in the united states
alabama
alaska
california
colorado
florida
hawaii
illinois
indiana
kentucky
maryland
massachusetts
michigan
minnesota
nebraska
new jersey
new mexico
new york
north carolina
north dakota
oregon
pennsylvania
rhode island
vermont
virginia
washington
wyoming
federal district
washington dc
territories
american samoa
puerto rico
us virgin islands
campaign finance reform
electoral college reform
rankedchoice voting
term limits
national primary
delaware plan
california plan
rotating regional primary system
interregional primary plan
open primaries
|
Links to external pages
Outloing links
www.wikidata.org
www.sightline.org
web.archive.org
www.nytimes.com
www.doi.org
search.worldcat.org
papers.ssrn.com
www.escholarship.org
search.worldcat.org
api.semanticscholar.org
www.sciencedirect.com
search.worldcat.org
www.independentvoterproject.org
www.scotusblog.com
web.archive.org
web.archive.org
www.sos.ca.gov
wei.sos.wa.gov
web.archive.org
web.archive.org
web.archive.org
results.vote.wa.gov
www.doi.org
web.archive.org
www.sos.wa.gov
blog.oregonlive.com
www.doi.org
www.doi.org
www.doi.org
www.doi.org
www.doi.org
web.archive.org
web.archive.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
www.wikimediafoundation.org
SEO Advice for en.wikipedia.org
In this section we provide pointers on how you can to optimize your web page so it can be found more easily by search engines and how to make it rank higher by optimizing the content of the page itself. For each of the individual criteria the maximum score is 100%. A score below 70% is considered to be indication that the page is not complying with general SEO standards and should be evaluated and/or fixed. Not every factor is weighted the same and some are not as important as others. Relatively unimportant factors like meta keywords are not included in the overall score.
Item | Factor | Pointers | |
---|---|---|---|
PageTitle | 100% | Far too many sites lack a page title. A page title is the first thing that shows in the search results so always use the title element. | |
Title relevance | 98% | A title should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 75 % match | |
Title Length | 80% | Limit your title to anywhere between 40 and 70 characters. Your title was 40 characters long | |
Meta Description | 0% | A meta description is the second element that shows in the search results so always use the meta description. | |
Meta description length | 0% | The meta description should be between 145 and 160 characters. This meta description is 1 characters long. | |
Meta description relevance | 0% | Meta Description should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 0 % match | |
Number of internal links | 30% | Linking to internal pages makes pages easier to find for search engines. Try to keep the number of links on your page roughly below 100. There are 401 internal links on this page. | |
Folder structure | 100% | We found a folder structure in the links on your page. A good folder structure makes a site easier to navigate. We found 3 level 1 folders and 6 folders above or in the first level of navigation. | |
Headings | 94% | Headers should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 41 % match | |
Links | 12% | Link anchors should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 6 % match | |
Image alt tags | 0% | Image alt tags should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 0 % match | |
Bold and italic | 51% | Bold and italic tags should reflect the contents of a site to some degree. This site has a 17 % match | |
Html ratio | 60% | Try to keep the html / text ratio as low as possible. More html means longer loading times. Layout should be handled in a serpate css file | |
Image descriptions | 70% | 70 % of all images have been described via the "alt" attribute. Describing images with relevant text may lead to better results in the search engines. | |
Page errors | 100% | Pages with no errors display significantly faster on most browsers. We detected 0 errors and warnings | |
WordCount | 20% | An ideal page contains between 400 and 600 words.This page contains 5051 words | |
Server response time | 30% | A slow server slows down a website. This server responds 415.65% slower the average | |
Gzip compression | 30% | This site does not use Gzip compression. Pages may not display as fast as they could | |
Keywords in Domainname | 30% | There are no important keywords in your domain name | |
Keywords in domain path | 100% | There are important keywords in the domain path | |
Structured Data | 100% | Structured data makes it easier for search engines to index your website | |
Inline css | 0% | Do not use inline css declarations. Inline css will slow down the rendering of the website. We detected 151 inline style declarations ( <a style="color:green">) with a size of 4290 bytes | |
Excessive use of the same words | 100% | There is no indication that there are one or more keywords that are used excessively. | |
Frames or iframes | 100% | Perfect, detected not (i)frames on your webpagina | |
Flash | 100% | Perfect, we detected no flash objects on your page | |
Css | 30% | We detected too much (2) CSS files on your page. Css files block the loading of a webpage. | |
Javascript | 100% | Perfect, we did not detect too many blocking JavaScript files | |
Mobile Website | 100% | Perfect, we found a responsive design for mobile users | |
Most important heading | 100% | Perfect, we detected a correct use of the most important (h1) heading! | |
Normalized headings | 40% | We dit not font a normalized heading structure. A heading 2 (h2) for example should be followed by a heading of an equal level (h2), a child heading (h3) or even a aprent heading (h1). |
How would you like to have SEO advice for all your pages ?? Start your SEO Dashboard and optimize your website!
en.wikipedia.org images and descriptions
10 images found at en.wikipedia.org Images can improve the user experience for a website by making a pag visually appealing Images can also add extra keyword relevance to a webpage by using alt tags. Images can also slow down a website. If the width and height for a picture is not specified for a browser know in advance how large the image is. A browser must first load the picture and see before it knows how much space should be on the page. Upon reservation In the meantime, the browser can do little but wait. When the height and width for the plate are given in the HTML code, a browser just continues to build for a page while the images load in the background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/icons/wikipedia.png height: 50 width: 50 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-wordmark-en.svg height: height attribute not set width: width attribute not set description: wikipedia |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-tagline-en.svg height: 13 width: 117 description: the free encyclopedia |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/82/electoral-systems-gears.svg/128px-electoral-systems-gears.svg.png height: 128 width: 128 description: no alt description found |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/01/a_coloured_voting_box.svg/16px-a_coloured_voting_box.svg.png height: 16 width: 16 description: icon |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f3/emblem-money.svg/16px-emblem-money.svg.png height: 16 width: 16 description: icon |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/nuvola_apps_edu_mathematics_blue-p.svg/16px-nuvola_apps_edu_mathematics_blue-p.svg.png height: 16 width: 16 description: icon |
|
https://login.wikimedia.org/wiki/special:centralautologin/start?type=1x1 height: 1 width: 1 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/footer/wikimedia-button.svg height: 29 width: 84 description: wikimedia foundation |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/resources/assets/poweredby_mediawiki.svg height: 31 width: 88 description: powered by mediawiki |
How are images contributing to your SEO site-wise ? Your leading content tool has the awnsers!