en.wikipedia.org website review
Improve your SEO :: free trial!
en.wikipedia.org is 66% geoptimaliseerd!
SEO Keyword summary for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/kanjirankulam_bird_sanctuary
Keywords are extracted from the main content of your website and are the primary indicator of the words this page could rank for. By frequenty count we expect your focus keyword to be sanctuary
Focus keyword
Short and long tail
Short Tail Keywords sanctuary bird wetland |
long Tail Keywords (2 words) bird sanctuary kanjirankulam bird sidebar hide tamil nadu point calimere |
long Tail Keywords (3 words) kanjirankulam bird sanctuary move to sidebar gulf of mannar stub you can wikipedia by expanding create account log ramanathapuram district tamil |
en.wikipedia.org On-Page SEO Scan
Descriptive Elements
The <head> element of a en.wikipedia.org/wiki/kanjirankulam_bird_sanctuary page is used to inform the browser and visitors of the page about the general meta information. The head section of the page is where we place the page title, the definition of the HTML version used, the language of in which the page is written. In the head section we can also include JavaScript and CSS (markup) files for the page.
Page title
Title length
kanjirankulam bird sanctuary wikipedia
Meta description
Meta description legth
Meta description SEO
No meta relevance in the description detected !
Content SEO
Number of Words
Spam detected?
Headings
Heading distribution
Heading normalisation
Heading SEO impact
Emphasis (bold and italic)
Emphasis SEO impact
Images
Number of images
Images dimensions
Image alt descriptions
Images SEO impact
wikipedia free encyclopedia stub icon wikimedia foundation powered mediawiki
Mobile SEO en.wikipedia.org/wiki/kanjirankulam_bird_sanctuary
Mobile rendering
Mobile optimizations
Responsive design detected (mobile css)
No flash detected !
Mobile improvement
Marketing / lead generation for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/kanjirankulam_bird_sanctuary
Social Media
Facebook shares | Facebook likes | ||
Facebook comments | Tweets | ||
Google +1 |
Conversion form
Search form
Analytics
Online presence
SERP Preview
SERP Title
SERP Link
SERP Description
Domain Level SEO
Domain name
16 characters long
Domain name SEO Impact
Path name
bird found in path !
kanjirankulam found in path !
sanctuary found in path !
Structured data
Publisher Markup
Other Structured data
Website configuration
Correct processing of non-existing pages?
Favicon icon found?
Robots.txt found?
Sitemap found?
Navigation and internal links
Navigation
Url seperator
Human readable urls
Number of links
Link SEO Impact
statistics
|
en.m.wikipedia.org |
en.wikipedia.org wikimedia foundation inc
|
w httpsenwikipediaorgwindexphptitlekanjirankulambirdsanctuaryoldid1217328854
page information
printable version
eremopogon foveolatus
keshopurmiani community reserve
|
wiki ramsar
protected areas of india
mudukulathur
ramanathapuram district
tamil nadu
india
chitrangudi bird sanctuary
heron
babul
ramsar site
tropical dry deciduous
prosopis juliflora
bermuda grass
invasive
prosopis
babuls
irrigation tank
bund
tamarind
fig
neem
portia
silk
drumstick
palmyra
migratory waterbirds
painted stork
white ibis
black ibis
little egret
great egret
madurai
paramakudi
madurai
sayalgudi
birdlife international
wayback machine
protected areas of tamil nadu
agasthyamalai
gulf of mannar
nilgiris
anamalai
grass hills
guindy
gulf of mannar marine biosphere reserve
karian shola
mudumalai
mukurthi
anamalai
cauvery north
cauvery south
gangaikondan
grizzled squirrel
kadavur
kalakkad mundanthurai
kanyakumari
srivilliputhur
mudumalai
point calimere
sathyamangalam
nellai
vallanadu
kallaperambur
karaivetti
karikili bird sanctuary
kazhuveli
koothankulam
melaselvanurkilaselvanur
nanjarayan
pulicat lake
suchindram theroor wetland complex
udayamarthandapuram bird sanctuary
vaduvur bird sanctuary
vedanthangal bird sanctuary
vellode
vettangudi
viralimalai
anamalai
mudumalai
sathyamangalam
coimbatore
tiruvidaimarudur
ramsar sites in india
andhra pradesh
kolleru lake
assam
deepor beel
bihar
kanwar lake
goa
nanda lake
gujarat
khijadiya
nalsarovar
thol lake
wadhvana wetland
haryana
sultanpur national park
bhindawas wildlife sanctuary
himachal pradesh
chandra taal
pong dam lake
renuka lake
jammu and kashmir
hokera wetland
surinsar
mansar lakes
wular lake
karnataka
ranganathittu bird sanctuary
kerala
ashtamudi wetland
sasthamkotta lake
vembanadkol wetland
ladakh
tsomoriri
tso kar
madhya pradesh
bhoj wetland
sakhya sagar
sirpur lake
yashwant sagar
maharashtra
nandur madhameshwar
lonar lake
thane creek
manipur
loktak lake
mizoram
pala wetland
odisha
anshupa lake
bhitarkanika mangroves
chilika lake
hirakud reservoir
satkosia gorge
tampara lake
punjab
beas conservation reserve
harike wetland
kanjli wetland
nangal wildlife sanctuary
ropar wetland
rajasthan
keoladeo national park
sambhar lake
point calimere wildlife and bird sanctuary
koonthankulam bird sanctuary
pallikaranai marsh reserve forest
pichavaram mangrove
vellode bird sanctuary
vembannur wetland complex
tripura
rudrasagar lake
uttar pradesh
bakhira sanctuary
haiderpur wetland
nawabganj bird sanctuary
parvati arga bird sanctuary
saman bird sanctuary
samaspur bird sanctuary
sandi bird sanctuary
sarsai nawar jheel
sur sarovar
upper ganga river
uttarakhand
asan barrage
west bengal
east kolkata wetlands
sundarban wetland
ramanathapuram district
|
Links to external pages
Outloing links
ta.wikipedia.org
www.wikidata.org
www.wikidata.org
geohack.toolforge.org
www.birdlife.org
web.archive.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
www.wikimediafoundation.org
SEO Advice for en.wikipedia.org
In this section we provide pointers on how you can to optimize your web page so it can be found more easily by search engines and how to make it rank higher by optimizing the content of the page itself. For each of the individual criteria the maximum score is 100%. A score below 70% is considered to be indication that the page is not complying with general SEO standards and should be evaluated and/or fixed. Not every factor is weighted the same and some are not as important as others. Relatively unimportant factors like meta keywords are not included in the overall score.
Item | Factor | Pointers | |
---|---|---|---|
PageTitle | 100% | Far too many sites lack a page title. A page title is the first thing that shows in the search results so always use the title element. | |
Title relevance | 100% | A title should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 100 % match | |
Title Length | 100% | Limit your title to anywhere between 40 and 70 characters. Your title was 41 characters long | |
Meta Description | 0% | A meta description is the second element that shows in the search results so always use the meta description. | |
Meta description length | 0% | The meta description should be between 145 and 160 characters. This meta description is 1 characters long. | |
Meta description relevance | 0% | Meta Description should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 0 % match | |
Number of internal links | 30% | Linking to internal pages makes pages easier to find for search engines. Try to keep the number of links on your page roughly below 100. There are 222 internal links on this page. | |
Folder structure | 100% | We found a folder structure in the links on your page. A good folder structure makes a site easier to navigate. We found 3 level 1 folders and 6 folders above or in the first level of navigation. | |
Headings | 100% | Headers should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 44 % match | |
Links | 20% | Link anchors should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 10 % match | |
Image alt tags | 62% | Image alt tags should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 22 % match | |
Bold and italic | 99% | Bold and italic tags should reflect the contents of a site to some degree. This site has a 33 % match | |
Html ratio | 30% | Try to keep the html / text ratio as low as possible. More html means longer loading times. Layout should be handled in a serpate css file | |
Image descriptions | 75% | 75 % of all images have been described via the "alt" attribute. Describing images with relevant text may lead to better results in the search engines. | |
Page errors | 100% | Pages with no errors display significantly faster on most browsers. We detected 0 errors and warnings | |
WordCount | 60% | An ideal page contains between 400 and 600 words.This page contains 845 words | |
Server response time | 30% | A slow server slows down a website. This server responds 167.82% slower the average | |
Gzip compression | 30% | This site does not use Gzip compression. Pages may not display as fast as they could | |
Keywords in Domainname | 100% | There are important keywords in your domain name | |
Keywords in domain path | 100% | There are important keywords in the domain path | |
Structured Data | 100% | Structured data makes it easier for search engines to index your website | |
Inline css | 0% | Do not use inline css declarations. Inline css will slow down the rendering of the website. We detected 106 inline style declarations ( <a style="color:green">) with a size of 2216 bytes | |
Excessive use of the same words | 100% | There is no indication that there are one or more keywords that are used excessively. | |
Frames or iframes | 100% | Perfect, detected not (i)frames on your webpagina | |
Flash | 100% | Perfect, we detected no flash objects on your page | |
Css | 30% | We detected too much (2) CSS files on your page. Css files block the loading of a webpage. | |
Javascript | 100% | Perfect, we did not detect too many blocking JavaScript files | |
Mobile Website | 100% | Perfect, we found a responsive design for mobile users | |
Most important heading | 100% | Perfect, we detected a correct use of the most important (h1) heading! | |
Normalized headings | 40% | We dit not font a normalized heading structure. A heading 2 (h2) for example should be followed by a heading of an equal level (h2), a child heading (h3) or even a aprent heading (h1). |
How would you like to have SEO advice for all your pages ?? Start your SEO Dashboard and optimize your website!
en.wikipedia.org images and descriptions
8 images found at en.wikipedia.org Images can improve the user experience for a website by making a pag visually appealing Images can also add extra keyword relevance to a webpage by using alt tags. Images can also slow down a website. If the width and height for a picture is not specified for a browser know in advance how large the image is. A browser must first load the picture and see before it knows how much space should be on the page. Upon reservation In the meantime, the browser can do little but wait. When the height and width for the plate are given in the HTML code, a browser just continues to build for a page while the images load in the background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/icons/wikipedia.png height: 50 width: 50 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-wordmark-en.svg height: height attribute not set width: width attribute not set description: wikipedia |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-tagline-en.svg height: 13 width: 117 description: the free encyclopedia |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d4/50px-india-locator-map-t-pa.jpg/25px-50px-india-locator-map-t-pa.jpg height: 27 width: 25 description: stub icon |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/d/d6/tamilnadu_small.png/27px-tamilnadu_small.png height: 34 width: 27 description: stub icon |
|
https://login.wikimedia.org/wiki/special:centralautologin/start?type=1x1 height: 1 width: 1 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/footer/wikimedia-button.svg height: 29 width: 84 description: wikimedia foundation |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/resources/assets/poweredby_mediawiki.svg height: 31 width: 88 description: powered by mediawiki |
How are images contributing to your SEO site-wise ? Your leading content tool has the awnsers!