en.wikipedia.org website review
Improve your SEO :: free trial!
en.wikipedia.org is 65% geoptimaliseerd!
SEO Keyword summary for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pratt_mountain
Keywords are extracted from the main content of your website and are the primary indicator of the words this page could rank for. By frequenty count we expect your focus keyword to be mount
Focus keyword
Short and long tail
Short Tail Keywords mount mountain new |
long Tail Keywords (2 words) mountain mount new hampshire pratt mountain sidebar hide new ipswich |
long Tail Keywords (3 words) move to sidebar new ipswich mountain create account log along the wapack hampshire trail guide new hampshire trail 4273250n 7191944w 4273250 |
en.wikipedia.org On-Page SEO Scan
Descriptive Elements
The <head> element of a en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pratt_mountain page is used to inform the browser and visitors of the page about the general meta information. The head section of the page is where we place the page title, the definition of the HTML version used, the language of in which the page is written. In the head section we can also include JavaScript and CSS (markup) files for the page.
Page title
Title length
pratt mountain wikipedia
Meta description
Meta description legth
Meta description SEO
No meta relevance in the description detected !
Content SEO
Number of Words
Spam detected?
Headings
Heading distribution
Heading normalisation
Heading SEO impact
Emphasis (bold and italic)
Emphasis SEO impact
Images
Number of images
Images dimensions
Image alt descriptions
Images SEO impact
wikipedia free encyclopedia flag stub icon wikimedia foundation powered mediawiki
Mobile SEO en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pratt_mountain
Mobile rendering
Mobile optimizations
Responsive design detected (mobile css)
No flash detected !
Mobile improvement
Marketing / lead generation for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/pratt_mountain
Social Media
Facebook shares | Facebook likes | ||
Facebook comments | Tweets | ||
Google +1 |
Conversion form
Search form
Analytics
Online presence
SERP Preview
SERP Title
SERP Link
SERP Description
Domain Level SEO
Domain name
16 characters long
Domain name SEO Impact
Path name
mount found in path !
mountain found in path !
pratt found in path !
Structured data
Publisher Markup
Other Structured data
Website configuration
Correct processing of non-existing pages?
Favicon icon found?
Robots.txt found?
Sitemap found?
Navigation and internal links
Navigation
Url seperator
Human readable urls
Number of links
Link SEO Impact
statistics
|
en.m.wikipedia.org |
en.wikipedia.org wikimedia foundation inc
|
w expanding it
view history
httpsenwikipediaorgwindexphptitleprattmountainoldid1221354534
page information
printable version
|
wiki read
coordinates
elevation
prominence
new ipswich
parent range
wapack range
age of rock
mountain type
metamorphic rock
easiest route
wapack trail
new hampshire
new ipswich mountain
mount watatic
souhegan river
merrimack river
atlantic ocean
millers river
connecticut river
long island sound
biodiversity
salamanders
appalachian mountain club
barrett mountain
usgs
mountains of new hampshire
belknap mountains
belknap mountain
gunstock mountain
mount major
mount rowe
ossipee mountains
bayle mountain
larcom mountain
mount roberts
mount shaw
mount whittier
nickerson mountain
turtleback mountain
kidder mountain
north pack monadnock
pack monadnock
temple mountain
white mountains
baldfaceroyce range
eastman mountain
mount meader
north baldface
south baldface
cartermoriah range
carter dome
imp mountain
middle carter mountain
middle moriah mountain
mount hight
mount moriah
north carter mountain
shelburne moriah mountain
south carter mountain
wildcat mountain
crescent range
black crescent mountain
mount crescent
franconia range
little haystack mountain
mount flume
mount lafayette
mount liberty
mount lincoln
kinsman range
the cannon balls
cannon mountain
kinsman mountain
mount pemigewasset
mahoosuc range
mount success
north bald cap
pilot range
the bulge
the horn
mount cabot
presidential range
boott spur
mount adams
mount clay
mount davis
mount eisenhower
mount franklin
mount isolation
mount jackson
mount jefferson
mount madison
mount monroe
mount pierce
mount washington
mount webster
sandwich range
mount chocorua
mount passaconaway
mount tripyramid
mount whiteface
sandwich mountain
the sleepers
twin range
galehead mountain
mount bond
mount guyot
mount hale
north twin mountain
nubble peak
south twin mountain
twin mountains
bartlett haystack
bear mountain
black cap
carr mountain
dartmouth range
dickey mountain
east peak mount osceola
jericho mountain
kearsarge north
loon mountain
mount avalon
mount blue
mount carrigain
mount cilley
mount crawford
mount doublehead
mount field
mount forest
mount garfield
mount hancock
mount mitten
mount moosilauke
mount nancy
mount osceola
mount rosebrook
mount starr king
mount tecumseh
mount tom
mount tremont
mount waumbek
mount weeks
mount willard
mount willey
mount zealand
north moat mountain
owls head carroll
owls head franconia
scar ridge
south weeks
blue job mountain
crotched mountain
gap mountain
little monadnock mountain
lovewell mountain
moose mountain
mount assurance
mount cardigan
mount kearsarge
mount kelsey
mount magalloway
mount monadnock
mount sunapee
pitcher mountain
potanipo hill
ragged mountain
skatutakee mountain
smarts mountain
tenney mountain
thumb mountain
uncanoonuc mountains
|
Links to external pages
Outloing links
lld.wikipedia.org
arz.wikipedia.org
ur.wikipedia.org
www.wikidata.org
geohack.toolforge.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
www.wikimediafoundation.org
SEO Advice for en.wikipedia.org
In this section we provide pointers on how you can to optimize your web page so it can be found more easily by search engines and how to make it rank higher by optimizing the content of the page itself. For each of the individual criteria the maximum score is 100%. A score below 70% is considered to be indication that the page is not complying with general SEO standards and should be evaluated and/or fixed. Not every factor is weighted the same and some are not as important as others. Relatively unimportant factors like meta keywords are not included in the overall score.
Item | Factor | Pointers | |
---|---|---|---|
PageTitle | 100% | Far too many sites lack a page title. A page title is the first thing that shows in the search results so always use the title element. | |
Title relevance | 100% | A title should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 100 % match | |
Title Length | 30% | Limit your title to anywhere between 40 and 70 characters. Your title was 27 characters long | |
Meta Description | 0% | A meta description is the second element that shows in the search results so always use the meta description. | |
Meta description length | 0% | The meta description should be between 145 and 160 characters. This meta description is 1 characters long. | |
Meta description relevance | 0% | Meta Description should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 0 % match | |
Number of internal links | 50% | Linking to internal pages makes pages easier to find for search engines. Try to keep the number of links on your page roughly below 100. There are 200 internal links on this page. | |
Folder structure | 100% | We found a folder structure in the links on your page. A good folder structure makes a site easier to navigate. We found 3 level 1 folders and 6 folders above or in the first level of navigation. | |
Headings | 100% | Headers should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 50 % match | |
Links | 20% | Link anchors should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 10 % match | |
Image alt tags | 28% | Image alt tags should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 10 % match | |
Bold and italic | 100% | Bold and italic tags should reflect the contents of a site to some degree. This site has a 88 % match | |
Html ratio | 30% | Try to keep the html / text ratio as low as possible. More html means longer loading times. Layout should be handled in a serpate css file | |
Image descriptions | 67% | 66.666666666667 % of all images have been described via the "alt" attribute. Describing images with relevant text may lead to better results in the search engines. | |
Page errors | 100% | Pages with no errors display significantly faster on most browsers. We detected 0 errors and warnings | |
WordCount | 60% | An ideal page contains between 400 and 600 words.This page contains 858 words | |
Server response time | 30% | A slow server slows down a website. This server responds 161.61% slower the average | |
Gzip compression | 30% | This site does not use Gzip compression. Pages may not display as fast as they could | |
Keywords in Domainname | 100% | There are important keywords in your domain name | |
Keywords in domain path | 100% | There are important keywords in the domain path | |
Structured Data | 100% | Structured data makes it easier for search engines to index your website | |
Inline css | 0% | Do not use inline css declarations. Inline css will slow down the rendering of the website. We detected 67 inline style declarations ( <a style="color:green">) with a size of 1171 bytes | |
Excessive use of the same words | 100% | There is no indication that there are one or more keywords that are used excessively. | |
Frames or iframes | 100% | Perfect, detected not (i)frames on your webpagina | |
Flash | 100% | Perfect, we detected no flash objects on your page | |
Css | 30% | We detected too much (2) CSS files on your page. Css files block the loading of a webpage. | |
Javascript | 100% | Perfect, we did not detect too many blocking JavaScript files | |
Mobile Website | 100% | Perfect, we found a responsive design for mobile users | |
Most important heading | 100% | Perfect, we detected a correct use of the most important (h1) heading! | |
Normalized headings | 40% | We dit not font a normalized heading structure. A heading 2 (h2) for example should be followed by a heading of an equal level (h2), a child heading (h3) or even a aprent heading (h1). |
How would you like to have SEO advice for all your pages ?? Start your SEO Dashboard and optimize your website!
en.wikipedia.org images and descriptions
9 images found at en.wikipedia.org Images can improve the user experience for a website by making a pag visually appealing Images can also add extra keyword relevance to a webpage by using alt tags. Images can also slow down a website. If the width and height for a picture is not specified for a browser know in advance how large the image is. A browser must first load the picture and see before it knows how much space should be on the page. Upon reservation In the meantime, the browser can do little but wait. When the height and width for the plate are given in the HTML code, a browser just continues to build for a page while the images load in the background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/icons/wikipedia.png height: 50 width: 50 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-wordmark-en.svg height: height attribute not set width: width attribute not set description: wikipedia |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-tagline-en.svg height: 13 width: 117 description: the free encyclopedia |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/18/pratt_summit_view.jpg/272px-pratt_summit_view.jpg height: 204 width: 272 description: no alt description found |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/28/flag_of_new_hampshire.svg/32px-flag_of_new_hampshire.svg.png height: 21 width: 32 description: flag |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/9/90/flag_map_of_new_hampshire.svg/20px-flag_map_of_new_hampshire.svg.png height: 39 width: 20 description: stub icon |
|
https://login.wikimedia.org/wiki/special:centralautologin/start?type=1x1 height: 1 width: 1 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/footer/wikimedia-button.svg height: 29 width: 84 description: wikimedia foundation |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/resources/assets/poweredby_mediawiki.svg height: 31 width: 88 description: powered by mediawiki |
How are images contributing to your SEO site-wise ? Your leading content tool has the awnsers!