en.wikipedia.org website review
Improve your SEO :: free trial!
en.wikipedia.org is 56% geoptimaliseerd!
SEO Keyword summary for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ranked_voting_systems
Keywords are extracted from the main content of your website and are the primary indicator of the words this page could rank for. By frequenty count we expect your focus keyword to be voting
Focus keyword
Short and long tail
Short Tail Keywords voting ranked condorcet |
long Tail Keywords (2 words) ranked voting condorcet winner borda count ranked-choice voting approval voting |
long Tail Keywords (3 words) ranked choice voting spatial voting models ranked voting systems move to sidebar no condorcet winner laureate dr kenneth arrow the center |
en.wikipedia.org On-Page SEO Scan
Descriptive Elements
The <head> element of a en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ranked_voting_systems page is used to inform the browser and visitors of the page about the general meta information. The head section of the page is where we place the page title, the definition of the HTML version used, the language of in which the page is written. In the head section we can also include JavaScript and CSS (markup) files for the page.
Page title
Title length
ranked voting wikipedia
Meta description
Meta description legth
Meta description SEO
No meta relevance in the description detected !
Content SEO
Number of Words
Spam detected?
Headings
Heading distribution
Heading normalisation
Heading SEO impact
Emphasis (bold and italic)
Emphasis SEO impact
Images
Number of images
Images dimensions
Image alt descriptions
Images SEO impact
wikipedia free encyclopedia icon edit wikidata wikimedia foundation powered mediawiki
Mobile SEO en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ranked_voting_systems
Mobile rendering
Mobile optimizations
Responsive design detected (mobile css)
No flash detected !
Mobile improvement
Marketing / lead generation for en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ranked_voting_systems
Social Media
Facebook shares | Facebook likes | ||
Facebook comments | Tweets | ||
Google +1 |
Conversion form
Search form
Analytics
Online presence
SERP Preview
SERP Title
SERP Link
SERP Description
Domain Level SEO
Domain name
16 characters long
Domain name SEO Impact
Path name
ranked found in path !
system found in path !
systems found in path !
voting found in path !
Structured data
Publisher Markup
Other Structured data
Website configuration
Correct processing of non-existing pages?
Favicon icon found?
Robots.txt found?
Sitemap found?
Navigation and internal links
Navigation
Url seperator
Human readable urls
Number of links
Link SEO Impact
statistics
|
en.m.wikipedia.org |
en.wikipedia.org wikimedia foundation inc
|
w view history
httpsenwikipediaorgwindexphptitlerankedvotingoldid1242610534
page information
printable version
ranked voting systems
seat linkage system
dominance paradox
harsanyis utilitarian theorem
|
wiki read
social choice
electoral systems
mechanism design
comparative politics
comparison of voting systems
voting systems by country
singlewinner methods
plurality
firstpastthepost voting
tworound system
jungle primary
partisan primary
instantrunoff voting
alternative vote
condorcet methods
condorcetirv
roundrobin voting
minimax
schulze method
ranked pairs
maximal lottery
positional systems
firstpreference plurality
borda count
baldwin
antiplurality
coombs
rated voting
score voting
approval voting
majority judgment
star voting
proportional
partylist
apportionment
highest averages method
largest remainders
national remnant
biproportional
list type
closed list
open list
panachage
listfree pr
localized list
quotaremainder methods
single transferable vote
schulze stv
cpostv
quota borda
approvalbased committees
proportional approval voting
phragmens method
expanding approvals rule
method of equal shares
fractional social choice
direct representation
interactive representation
liquid democracy
fractional approval voting
random ballot
semiproportional
cumulative voting
single nontransferable vote
limited voting
mixed systems
mixedmember majoritarian
compensatory
parallel voting
coexistence
fusion majority bonus
additional member system
vote linkage mixed system
scorporo
mixed ballot transferable vote
mixed
dualmember proportional
majority jackpot
mixed single vote
double simultaneous vote
electoral pathologies
spoiler effect
cloning paradox
condorcet winner criterion
center squeeze
perverse response
bestisworst paradox
noshow paradox
multiple districts paradox
strategic voting
lesser evil voting
truncation
turkeyraising
simple majoritarianism
tyranny of the majority
discursive dilemma
majority impossibility
social choice theory
impossibility theorems
arrows impossibility theorem
moulins impossibility theorem
mckelveyschofield chaos theorem
gibbards theorem
median voter theorem
condorcets jury theorem
mays theorem
condorcet dominance theorems
voting system
orderings rankings
degenerate
misnomer
conflation
electoral systems
ramon llull
copelands method
nicholas of cusa
jeancharles de borda
marquis de condorcet
condorcet methods
majoritypreferred candidate
carl andr
denmark
duncan black
kenneth arrow
welfare economics
rational choice
democracies
thomas hare
british empire
tasmania
australia
ireland
south africa
malta
in the united states
canada
maine
2022 congressional special election
peltola
alaska
nauru
dowdall system
local elections
voting
rankedchoice runoff
condorcet efficiency
condorcet winner
condorcet cycle
wellbeing of society
implicit utilitarian voting
anthony downs
political spectrum
firstpastthepost
minimax
group voting ticket
history and use of instantrunoff voting
matrix vote
preferential block voting
voting methods in deliberative assemblies
isbn
oclc
cardinal systems
issn
singlewinner
combined approval voting
unified primary
bucklin voting
dodgsons method
kemenyyoung method
minimax condorcet method
nansons method
exhaustive ballot
coombs method
contingent vote
supplementary vote
plurality
positional voting system
graduated majority judgment
sequential proportional approval voting
hareclark
spare vote
indirect single transferable voting
webstersaintelagu
dhondt
largest remainders method
droop quota
hagenbachbischoff quota
hare quota
imperiali quota
alternative vote plus
satisfaction approval voting
condorcet loser criterion
consistency criterion
independence of clones
independence of irrelevant alternatives
independence of smithdominated alternatives
laternoharm criterion
majority criterion
majority loser criterion
monotonicity criterion
mutual majority criterion
participation criterion
plurality criterion
resolvability criterion
reversal symmetry
smith criterion
seatstovotes ratio
ballot
election threshold
firstpreference votes
spoilt vote
sortition
unseating
|
Links to external pages
Outloing links
cy.wikipedia.org
de.wikipedia.org
el.wikipedia.org
fa.wikipedia.org
fr.wikipedia.org
ko.wikipedia.org
hi.wikipedia.org
hu.wikipedia.org
ja.wikipedia.org
no.wikipedia.org
nn.wikipedia.org
uz.wikipedia.org
pl.wikipedia.org
pt.wikipedia.org
ro.wikipedia.org
ru.wikipedia.org
fi.wikipedia.org
th.wikipedia.org
zh-yue.wikipedia.org
zh.wikipedia.org
www.wikidata.org
www.wikidata.org
commons.wikimedia.org
www.google.com
www.google.com
www.google.com
www.google.com
scholar.google.com
www.jstor.org
search.worldcat.org
web.archive.org
search.worldcat.org
www.archive.org
books.google.com
www.fairvote.org
www.youtube.com
www.ballotpedia.org
www.rcv123.org
www.rcv123.org
www.fairvote.org
www.wikidata.org
id.loc.gov
olduli.nli.org.il
foundation.wikimedia.org
foundation.wikimedia.org
www.wikimediafoundation.org
SEO Advice for en.wikipedia.org
In this section we provide pointers on how you can to optimize your web page so it can be found more easily by search engines and how to make it rank higher by optimizing the content of the page itself. For each of the individual criteria the maximum score is 100%. A score below 70% is considered to be indication that the page is not complying with general SEO standards and should be evaluated and/or fixed. Not every factor is weighted the same and some are not as important as others. Relatively unimportant factors like meta keywords are not included in the overall score.
Item | Factor | Pointers | |
---|---|---|---|
PageTitle | 100% | Far too many sites lack a page title. A page title is the first thing that shows in the search results so always use the title element. | |
Title relevance | 87% | A title should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 67 % match | |
Title Length | 30% | Limit your title to anywhere between 40 and 70 characters. Your title was 26 characters long | |
Meta Description | 0% | A meta description is the second element that shows in the search results so always use the meta description. | |
Meta description length | 0% | The meta description should be between 145 and 160 characters. This meta description is 1 characters long. | |
Meta description relevance | 0% | Meta Description should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 0 % match | |
Number of internal links | 30% | Linking to internal pages makes pages easier to find for search engines. Try to keep the number of links on your page roughly below 100. There are 375 internal links on this page. | |
Folder structure | 100% | We found a folder structure in the links on your page. A good folder structure makes a site easier to navigate. We found 3 level 1 folders and 6 folders above or in the first level of navigation. | |
Headings | 76% | Headers should reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 33 % match | |
Links | 14% | Link anchors should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 7 % match | |
Image alt tags | 28% | Image alt tags should to some degree reflect the contents of a site. This site has a 10 % match | |
Bold and italic | 39% | Bold and italic tags should reflect the contents of a site to some degree. This site has a 13 % match | |
Html ratio | 60% | Try to keep the html / text ratio as low as possible. More html means longer loading times. Layout should be handled in a serpate css file | |
Image descriptions | 50% | 50 % of all images have been described via the "alt" attribute. Describing images with relevant text may lead to better results in the search engines. | |
Page errors | 100% | Pages with no errors display significantly faster on most browsers. We detected 0 errors and warnings | |
WordCount | 20% | An ideal page contains between 400 and 600 words.This page contains 3356 words | |
Server response time | 30% | A slow server slows down a website. This server responds 226.53% slower the average | |
Gzip compression | 30% | This site does not use Gzip compression. Pages may not display as fast as they could | |
Keywords in Domainname | 30% | There are no important keywords in your domain name | |
Keywords in domain path | 100% | There are important keywords in the domain path | |
Structured Data | 100% | Structured data makes it easier for search engines to index your website | |
Inline css | 0% | Do not use inline css declarations. Inline css will slow down the rendering of the website. We detected 73 inline style declarations ( <a style="color:green">) with a size of 2215 bytes | |
Excessive use of the same words | 100% | There is no indication that there are one or more keywords that are used excessively. | |
Frames or iframes | 100% | Perfect, detected not (i)frames on your webpagina | |
Flash | 100% | Perfect, we detected no flash objects on your page | |
Css | 30% | We detected too much (2) CSS files on your page. Css files block the loading of a webpage. | |
Javascript | 100% | Perfect, we did not detect too many blocking JavaScript files | |
Mobile Website | 100% | Perfect, we found a responsive design for mobile users | |
Most important heading | 100% | Perfect, we detected a correct use of the most important (h1) heading! | |
Normalized headings | 40% | We dit not font a normalized heading structure. A heading 2 (h2) for example should be followed by a heading of an equal level (h2), a child heading (h3) or even a aprent heading (h1). |
How would you like to have SEO advice for all your pages ?? Start your SEO Dashboard and optimize your website!
en.wikipedia.org images and descriptions
16 images found at en.wikipedia.org Images can improve the user experience for a website by making a pag visually appealing Images can also add extra keyword relevance to a webpage by using alt tags. Images can also slow down a website. If the width and height for a picture is not specified for a browser know in advance how large the image is. A browser must first load the picture and see before it knows how much space should be on the page. Upon reservation In the meantime, the browser can do little but wait. When the height and width for the plate are given in the HTML code, a browser just continues to build for a page while the images load in the background.
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/icons/wikipedia.png height: 50 width: 50 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-wordmark-en.svg height: height attribute not set width: width attribute not set description: wikipedia |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/mobile/copyright/wikipedia-tagline-en.svg height: 13 width: 117 description: the free encyclopedia |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/9/99/question_book-new.svg/50px-question_book-new.svg.png height: 39 width: 50 description: no alt description found |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/4/4d/rankballotoval.gif/160px-rankballotoval.gif height: 206 width: 160 description: no alt description found |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/15/rankballotname2.gif/160px-rankballotname2.gif height: 202 width: 160 description: no alt description found |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/18/preferential_ballot.svg/160px-preferential_ballot.svg.png height: 207 width: 160 description: no alt description found |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/82/electoral-systems-gears.svg/128px-electoral-systems-gears.svg.png height: 128 width: 128 description: no alt description found |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/0/01/a_coloured_voting_box.svg/16px-a_coloured_voting_box.svg.png height: 16 width: 16 description: icon |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/f3/emblem-money.svg/16px-emblem-money.svg.png height: 16 width: 16 description: icon |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3e/nuvola_apps_edu_mathematics_blue-p.svg/16px-nuvola_apps_edu_mathematics_blue-p.svg.png height: 16 width: 16 description: icon |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/8/8b/irvcopeland.png/420px-irvcopeland.png height: 220 width: 420 description: no alt description found |
|
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/8/8a/oojs_ui_icon_edit-ltr-progressive.svg/10px-oojs_ui_icon_edit-ltr-progressive.svg.png height: 10 width: 10 description: edit this at wikidata |
|
https://login.wikimedia.org/wiki/special:centralautologin/start?type=1x1 height: 1 width: 1 description: no alt description found |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/static/images/footer/wikimedia-button.svg height: 29 width: 84 description: wikimedia foundation |
|
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/resources/assets/poweredby_mediawiki.svg height: 31 width: 88 description: powered by mediawiki |
How are images contributing to your SEO site-wise ? Your leading content tool has the awnsers!